Nope, still two consenting adults committing in a ceremony.
Maybe you mean like allowing women to vote changed the meaning of voting.
Let's see....
NOPE.
while other folks keep pretending to know what the opposition is about.
oh i understand. you want your value system enforced by law. just like them commies, but on the flip side.
Marriage has been defined, by aged tradition, as a union of of one man & one woman. Those who find the redefinition of marriage to be a threat to the institution of marriage are only asking that nothing change.
what about civil unions for purposes of medical + legal permissions when one party becomes disabled?
that would seem to be key, and the thing i've heard the most concern about.
presumably you'd have no issue with that.
It seems as though the ones who want law are the ones attempting to require the "right" of homosexual marriage - through law.