Not to mention, the Cambrian explosion (Darwin admitted this objection can be made against his theory of evolution, in the macro sense I believe) and the plenty of evidence of man and dinosaur co-existing.
Darwin admitted that he had no explanation for the Cambrian explosion...mostly because he had no evidence to back it up. Then again, he wasn't trying to prove that the Cambrien explosion happened or didn't happen. He was trying to show the mechanism that nature uses in evolution.
Evolution was accepted as fact long before Darwin came along...the mechanics of it weren't well researched or understood, but the fact of it was not in contention.
As for the 2nd part of that statment...evidence of man and dinausaur co-existing. Now THAT, I would love to see. Let's start with proving that dinausaurs still existed less than 65 million years ago. Then let's put mankind (and by that, I assume that you mean modern man homo sapien sapiens) more than 65 million years ago.
Have fun.