Inkara1 said:Meanwhile, the Olds offers:
1. Poor crash protection for its size, since it lacks air bags or crumple zones, and would be of no help in a rollover. If you run into a Geo with it you might be OK, but hit an SUV, a tree or a wall and you're fuxx0red;
2. The double whammy of poor gas mileage and poor power;
3. 1980s GM parts, such as the 60,000-mile alternator;
4. The double whammy of generic looks and poor aerodynamics;
5. A fairly smooth, although not particularly controlled ride, at the expense of handling and stopping distances.
If you've ever wondered why we've all been behind the idea of you getting the 1997 Nissan, which is faster, gets better mileage, is safer and is more reliable.
Professur said:Add to that, that you've got room between the framerails to drop in pretty much anything you want, including stuffing a 572 under the hood.
Inkara1 said:I've lived in California too long, I guess. Good luck ever getting a 572 to pass smog here. Drop it in a 1973 or older model and you're golden, because they're smog-exempt. But 1974 and newer models have to pass smog to be street-legal.
Inkara1 said:Seems like it would be awfully hard to get complete combustion in a cylinder that large with only one spark plug. That's the reason Dodge went with 10 cylinders instead of 8 for the Viper and Ram V10. The GM Vortec 8100 V8 is only available in vehicles with a GVWR of 8,600 pounds or above (3/4-ton trucks), which have different regulations than passenger cars. Both the 8100 and the V10 have the benefit of modern emissions controls, though, while a properly set up 572 would have a good four-barrel carb, possibly two if you want to synchronize them, headers, dual exhausts with a crossover pipe and glass packs, and that's it.![]()