idunno said:
Nice to see you assumed scam first. Especially for you I managed to get a hold of the actual physical paper, which I'll scan the article from and upload tonight.
No, I didn't asume anything. I clearly stated that either the times corrected the article or the site was a scam. If you click on that link, you'll be directed to the electronic version of the article and you'll be able to see that it doesn't say 64-bit per second.
But since you already posted a scan of the paper, the obvious answer is that the times corrected the webpage.
And I still doubt that Bill Gates said "64-bit per second", it must have been the writer's mistake.
Not that I'm bitter or anything.