Search results

I think you'll find IBM is only the one... ;)

I could have sworn the sabbath was Saturday. :confused:

Ah fuck it, if we're gonna look at history then we should blame Africa, that's where human evolution began isn't it? If we're really lucky we could probably find a nice little muslim country with loads of oil to blame, might as well stick with tradition...

Tries desparately not to respond...

Nah, I've been doing various martial arts since I was a kid and ran my own club for a while. Mainly do weapons work. Just seemed to start collecting them. Every house should have at least one proper sword. Nice idea about France though, I do have a longbow kicking around too...

Currently have 5 swords, a couple of polearms and more knives than I can count. Saving up for the 12 bore...

Lol! Don't get me started again... :)

You honestly think that? It must be nice to live in a world where averything is either black or white.

So the only difference is that I see it as the US not breaking international law, you see it as the US being told what to do by others. Is that it?

Let me get this straight... The US ignored the issue of international terrorism for decades because it didn't really affect them despite the pleas of it's allies to help out and take the issue seriously, however when the US is the target the rest of the world has to sit back and accept the...

Sorry missed this bit. This is exactly my point. It is the UKs right to punish it's citizens for what could in theory be classed as treason if they are tried and convicted. The difference I am sure you will have noticed is that they MAY STAND TRIAL on their return to the UK. The were never...

This would be absolutely fine if the prisoners were either declared POWs and then accorded treatment in line with the GC or charged with criminal activity and held awaiting trial. As neither of these has happened the only assumption I can draw is that either the US does not care about the...

I assume it would be the some for Klienfelter syndrome? Does this mean that all competitors would be subjected to compulsory chromosomal screening to determine their catagory?

Ok, how about a woman with Swyer's syndrome?

So is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Firstly I am talking about the UK citizens you are illegally holding. Secondly my point is that just because your government says something is so does not mean it is. Are they dangerous? Possibly, possibly not. Until they are given a fair trial we will never know. What happened to...

I have very strong opinions on pretty much all of these people, but unlike you I try and stick to the facts of the subject at hand and not change the subject when I am proven wrong.

Source Source Source

So you would be happy for the government of... lets say Saudi Arabia to hold US citizens without trial for an indefinite period of time as long as they told you that it was because the Saudi government saw them as a security risk? Of course you wouldn't want them to supply any evidence of this...

How do you know they were captured whilst fighting? Because your government told you? Does it not scare you that using this as precedent any country could now imprison any US citizen without trial for as long as they wanted just so long as they say "they are a threat to our security"?