Search results

The second you log onto the net you can be traced, giving you a name and location only makes it easier. So how does your (I assume humourous) attempt to imply the US government would track someone down from another country simply because they vocally disagree with their illegal practices...

Your point is?

Frighteningly that is one of the most accurate things I've seen you say.

And if they're not shooting at you? and if they are captured by the military when not involved inmilitary action? how about if you were supposed to be a spy for the invading forces?

Will you stop over-reacting. I simply want you to expand on your reasons, all you have done so far is swear at me and tell me that you said it before. The whole idea of a debate such as this is that you post your thoughts and ideas and opinions, if you are neither willing nor able to do...

You think that the Geneva Convention allows for you to randomly shoot people who may possibly have been in a position to shoot at you? I'm not surprised you think it's ok to lock up innocent people. Now how about this But even though you admit some of them weren't captured in Afghanistan...

MI5 has powers related to intelligence gathering regarding security within the UK, as far as I am aware they have no powers of arrest or detention, though I could be worng on this.

No what? In the other thread you said that you thought the imprisonment of these people was ok, I was wondering how you felt now you have read the account of one of them.

Read the articles, it's quite clear.

For those of you who find the Mirror's credibilty a little on the thin side here is the same story in a much more respectable paper. The Times

Unlike you he was there the entire time, I'm more inclined to believe him than someone who admits he didn't see him captured but quite vociferously claims he was an enemy combatant. Lets see what the other prisoners say eh?

He received the equivalent of $90,000 for letting the Mirror have an exclusive. The problem is that the tabloid press have the money and the more respectable press won't pay for exclusives as their readership buys them regardless. So, assuming you have read his account how do you justify his...

Lets face it, the guy was released because it was eventually decided he wasn't a threat asnd he hasn't been charged with anything related to terrorism on his return, but if he didn't have a reason to hate the US before he certainly does now. I think that he deserves every penny he can get...

Yeah it can't possibly be true if it's in the mirror. Get real. It make me sick that you continue to try and justify this abuse.

Now there's an idea!!! :D

She was the first of the royals that wasn't a minger, add that to the fact that she was really good at PR and she was always going to be a hit. Others did and still do more charity work, others have been in loveless relationships, all she ever did that was different was shag Al Fayed's son...

I gave up "drinking" when I discovered "guzzling"... :rolleyes:

Assuming you've got a wound of some sort under that bandage pouring neat vodka on it certainly isn't going to be painless...

Especially by an aircraft that no longer flies! :D Sounds like a pretty good idea, beats just rolling up with tanks any day.

My fav was a plain black t-shirt with the word "INSECURITY" on the back.