Search results

Sorry but he did say right there that he did not know what it was. That to me says he is merely against it because others are against it and he wants to look good.

He may just be going along with the crowd. While I am against the use of torture, I would say he should find out what waterboarding is before he makes that judgement.

:lol:

I was actually making a joke when I posted that. The only reasons I can see law abiding citizens carry is for protection or hunting

Well if you aren't uber badass like them why are you carrying? :p

That is true though I do not think it should be. It is a flag and a symbol of America's history (regardless of whether or not I agree with the South per se is irrelevant). I'd say his example of the membership in a racist group should count for more than the flag

So you beat me up and it is to take my wallet but the pattern of beat up white heterosexuals then you get 3-6 but if you continue to do it to anyone who is white and heterosexual in any way then they slap it? As I had understood it, it was the motive. Say you beat up a black person solely...

If I don't get swamped again yes.

True enough, though by definition those would be considered hate crimes in and of themselves. But double standards live on for everyone

That could probably be said for any politican though that they just want votes and it comes to voting the less of 2 evils since they blow almost all ideals to hell.

That depends on the motivation. A homosexual beats up on a hetero for example. Is it because the guy is hetero or is it because of a fight or was he mugging him? If it is because he was hetero then yes. Otherwise no. The same would apply to all the other questions

That would be a skew since by logical reasoning it was his inattention to the sign though you were able to personalise the accident into an attack. I see where you are coming from now. Apologies for my misinterpertation

I did not think that just because of a higher population you could skew it any more than if you had a low population? You can skew it as much as you like regardless of population (and often people will skew it for their agendas)

Or pretty much any major city anywhere. Still hatecrimes are committed and still racism and bigotry ensue in those places.

The one where all are trained and carry legally. Would be the safest door to go into.

Of those choices, I like the first choice myself

Until his whole spiel on Brittany, I had no idea who he was. Now I know who he is, I just don't care. He is who he is.

Whatever it is I did, I didn't do it

As you always say,they are the same it is the marketing that changes is all. But they are the same

There are hate crimes in the North. There is racism in the North. Not all from the South (not even most. I am in school in NC and it has been fairly open to people down here) are redneck hateful assholes. Judging all by some is a generalisation which is usually wrong. Mike: For what it...